lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [take22 0/4] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
    On Mon 2006-11-06 13:13:29, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
    > On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:47:41PM +0100, Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz) wrote:
    > > It has been show in this thread that kevent is too different to kqueue
    > > as is... but what are the advantages of kevent? Perhaps we should use
    > > kqueue on Linux, too (even if it means one more rewrite for you...?)
    >
    > Should we use *BSD VMM system when we have superiour Linux one?

    Very different question; VMM system is not something that has userland
    API.

    Can you explain why kevent is better than kqueue?

    > P.S. Do not drop Cc: list.

    It was not me who dropped cc list.

    Pavel
    --
    (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
    (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-11-06 11:19    [W:0.019 / U:0.152 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site