lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [take22 0/4] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
On Mon 2006-11-06 13:13:29, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:47:41PM +0100, Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz) wrote:
> > It has been show in this thread that kevent is too different to kqueue
> > as is... but what are the advantages of kevent? Perhaps we should use
> > kqueue on Linux, too (even if it means one more rewrite for you...?)
>
> Should we use *BSD VMM system when we have superiour Linux one?

Very different question; VMM system is not something that has userland
API.

Can you explain why kevent is better than kqueue?

> P.S. Do not drop Cc: list.

It was not me who dropped cc list.

Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-06 11:19    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site