lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 6 Nov 2006 20:25:19 -0500
FromDave Jones <>
SubjectRe: VIA IRQ quirk missing PCI ids since 2.6.16.17
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:13:45PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
 > +static const struct pci_device_id via_vlink_fixup_tbl[] = {
 > +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8233_0), 17},
 > +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8233A), 17 },
 > +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8233C_0), 17 },
 > +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8235), 16 },
 > +	/* May not be needed for the 8237 */
 > +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237), 15 },
 > +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237A), 15 },
 >  	{ 0, },

This got me wondering what PCI_VDEVICE was, so I went looking.
It's a libata'ism it seems with the comment..

/* move to PCI layer? */
Which sounds like a good idea to me.  But until this is moved,
does quirks.c actually compile with this patch? I don't see
an include of linux/libata.h there.

When it gets moved to the PCI layer, I wonder if it'd be worth
doing the same thing to the second argument, so that we'd be
able to do..

	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, VIA_8233_0), 17},
Or maybe even..

	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, 8233_0), 17},
?

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-07 01:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2008