[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: locking hierarchy based on lockdep

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Roland Dreier wrote:

> > i like your idea of using lockdep to document locking hierarchies.
> Yes, it's definitely a cool idea. I think the current implementation
> is not that useful, since it jams all the unrelated kernel locks into
> a single ordered list, when in fact many locks simply have no ordering
> relationship at all because they're never both taken. This makes the
> list hard to read and in fact loses the information of which locks
> have been taken together.
> - R.

interesting...perhaps if we layered say the directory structure on the
list too like by the top level kernel directories drivers, kernel, mm,
net, etc. it might be more readable.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-06 21:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean