lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 6 Nov 2006 08:23:23 +0100
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] debug workqueue locking sanity
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

> +		if (unlikely(in_atomic()
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> +			|| current->lockdep_depth > 0
> +#endif
> +			)) {

i agree with this patch, but shouldnt this #ifdef be hidden via some 
sort of lockdep_depth() inline in lockdep.h that just returns 0 if 
!LOCKDEP?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-06 07:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2008