![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Brad Campbell wrote: > I've never seen this behaviour in a drive. All the drives I've seen mark > bad sectors as "pending reallocation", they they return read errors on > that sector unless they manage to jag a good read, in which case they > then reallocate the sector. Or else they wait for you to write to the > sector triggering a reallocation. > This is exactly what they are required to do by the relevant standards. The drive can not silently discard data and reallocate the sector. It either has to get a successful read of the old data, then reallocate, or wait for the host to write new data, and store that in the new location. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-06 02:51 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||