![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:35:04AM +0100, Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote: > Doesn't the provided solution is just a in-kernel variant of the > SCHED_FIFO set from userspace? Why kernel should be able to mark some > users as having higher priority? > What if workload of the system is targeted to not the maximum TCP > performance, but maximum other-task performance, which will be broken > with provided patch. David's line of thinking for a solution sounds better to me. This patch does not prevent the process from being preempted (for potentially a long time), by any means. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-30 11:13 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||