lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] prune_icache_sb
On 11/30/06, Wendy Cheng <wcheng@redhat.com> wrote:
> How about a simple and plain change with this uploaded patch ....
>
> The idea is, instead of unconditionally dropping every buffer associated
> with the particular mount point (that defeats the purpose of page
> caching), base kernel exports the "drop_pagecache_sb()" call that allows
> page cache to be trimmed. More importantly, it is changed to offer the
> choice of not randomly purging any buffer but the ones that seem to be
> unused (i_state is NULL and i_count is zero). This will encourage
> filesystem(s) to pro actively response to vm memory shortage if they
> choose so.
>
> From our end (cluster locks are expensive - that's why we cache them),
> one of our kernel daemons will invoke this newly exported call based on
> a set of pre-defined tunables. It is then followed by a lock reclaim
> logic to trim the locks by checking the page cache associated with the
> inode (that this cluster lock is created for). If nothing is attached to
> the inode (based on i_mapping->nrpages count), we know it is a good
> candidate for trimming and will subsequently drop this lock (instead of
> waiting until the end of vfs inode life cycle).

I have a patch that is a more comprehensive version of this idea, but
it is not fully debugged, and has suffered some bitrot in the past
couple months. This turns out to be a good performance improvement in
the general case too, but is more complex than your idea because there
are real locking changes needed to avoid deadlocks. I can send you a
copy of the patch if you are interested.

> Note that I could do invalidate_inode_pages() within our kernel modules
> to accomplish what drop_pagecache_sb() does (without coming here to bug
> people) but I don't have access to inode_lock as an external kernel
> module. So either EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_lock) or this patch ?

like i said above, you have to be careful when touching inode_lock,
dcache_lock, and the mapping's tree_lock, because of potential
deadlocks. the mapping's lock can be taken from softirq context, but
the inode and dcache locks cannot.

NATE
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-30 20:35    [W:0.110 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site