[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 1/4] - Potential performance bottleneck for Linxu TCP
    On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 09:33 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 07:56:58PM -0600, Wenji Wu wrote:
    > > Yes, when CONFIG_PREEMPT is disabled, the "problem" won't happen. That is why I put "for 2.6 desktop, low-latency desktop" in the uploaded paper. This "problem" happens in the 2.6 Desktop and Low-latency Desktop.
    > CONFIG_PREEMPT is only for people that are in for the feeling. There is no
    > real world advtantage to it and we should probably remove it again.

    There certainly is a real world advantage for many applications. Of
    course it would be better if the latency requirements could be met
    without kernel preemption but that's not the case now.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-11-30 17:53    [W:0.019 / U:183.068 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site