lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 03 Nov 2006 11:25:37 +0300
FromAlexey Starikovskiy <>
SubjectRe: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)
Could this be a problem?
--------------------
...
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
...
CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8=y
...
Regards,
	Alex.

Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:41:32AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>  > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc4 compared to 2.6.18
>  > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
>  > 
>  > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
>  > of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
>  > of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way possibly
>  > involved with one or more of these issues.
>  > 
>  > Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering.
>  > 
>  > Subject    : cpufreq not working on AMD K8
>  > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/10/114
>  > Submitter  : Christian <christiand59@web.de>
>  > Status     : unknown
> 
> As Mark mentioned in his followup, powernow-k8 didn't change in .19 at all.
> I'm suspecting an ACPI change meant that we no longer find the PST tables
> correctly.
> 
> Christian, can you post the full dmesg's from the working/broken kernels.
> It may be useful to enable CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG too.
> 
> 	Dave
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-03 08:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2008