![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> [] >>> PS. Do you have any benchmarks of your filesystem? Did you do any longer >>> automated tests to prove it is not going to loose data to easily? >> >> I have, I may find them and post them. (but the university wants me to >> post them to some conference, so I should keep them secret :-/) > > Interesting to know, how "another one" FS is quick and stable. > > On my new hardware, with dual core CPU 3.4G, 1G of RAM, 1/2TB disk space > (office pro, yes *office* (pro)), `dd' can suck 50M/s, (running and) > extracting 2.6.19-rc2 on fresh 20Gb partition (xfs,jfs) yields nearly 4M/s. > > As for ordinary user it seems very slowly. So try my filesystem and tell me if I have it better :) > Ext2 (not ext3) is as fast as shmfs, until RAM will be full. > And after 13 cycles XFS has 11-12 directories with good linux source, > ext2 6-7 (IIRC). On start of 14th cycle i pushed reset button, btw. My Spadfs will leave there snapshot of situation at most 2 minutes ago (this sync interval can be changed with mount option). > Mounting & repairing XFS took less than minute; e2fsck spent more time > on printing, rather than reparing, i think (:. > > Want to create another one? OK, but why not to improve existing? >/dev/null Because redesign is sometimes better. And you can't generally improve XFS and JFS by simplifying their structures, because people would scream about incompatibility then. Mikulas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-03 22:45 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||