![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> So unless there is some other array that is sized by NR_IRQs > in the context switch path which could account for this in > other ways. It looks like you just got unlucky. TLB/cache profiling data might be useful? My bet would be more on cache effects. > The only hypothesis that I can seem to come up with is that maybe > you are getting an extra tlb now that you didn't use to. > I think the per cpu area is covered by huge pages but maybe not. It should be. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-03 18:51 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||