Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:10:45 +0100 | From | Paolo Ornati <> | Subject | [SOLVED] Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc5: known regressions (v2) |
| |
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:44:51 +0100 Paolo Ornati <ornati@fastwebnet.it> wrote:
> > > Okay, please let us know if it survives the next several cycles. > > > > > > OTOH, the problem may be hiding. > > > > Ok, and if it survives againg and again I can do a partial bisection... > > "-rc5" is still alive: 6 days of uptime using suspend/resume many times > every day... > > so if the problem is there it's hiding very well. > > > Now I'll slowly go back with older kernels and see what happens...
SHORT CONCLUSION: it was just a kernel miscompilation (I usually do "make oldconfig; make clean; make" so I don't know if I missed "make clean" or if it was caused by ccache...).
The fact that it's a miscompilation is "proved" by 3 simple things:
1) I've only seen the problem with that particular version
2) slow bisection pointed that the ipotetic bug was fixed between 4b1c46a3..d1ed6a3e, but I don't see any change that matters (on x86_64).
3) I'm running a clean recompiled 2.6.19-rc4-g4b1c46a3, that doesn't have any problem.
:D
-- Paolo Ornati Linux 2.6.19-rc4-g4b1c46a3 on x86_64 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |