lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 29 Nov 2006 09:20:24 +0000
FromRussell King <>
SubjectRe: Boot failure with ext2 and initrds
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:30:36AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:40:00 +0000
> Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> > Yet another attempt to get a response from Andrew.  It is rather
> > important that you DO respond to this.
> 
> You can read the code as easily as I can?

Sigh.  Please don't cut the relevant part of my _first_ email message
where it can be clearly seen that I _have_ read the code and interpreted
it _differently_ from you.

> I'm not really sure what you're asking - I thought Mingming cleared
> things up.

Which message did this happen?

What I'm looking for is confirmation of the semantics of
find_next_zero_bit(), which is a fairly simple question to ask, and
certainly does not justify this rather obtuse and difficult thread.

<extremely frustrated>

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-29 09:23    [W:0.188 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans