Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | | Date | Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:57:34 +0100 | | From | Ingo Molnar <> | | Subject | Re: 2.6.19-rc6-rt8 |
| |
* Karsten Wiese <fzu@wemgehoertderstaat.de> wrote:
> Am Montag, 27. November 2006 10:49 schrieb Ingo Molnar: > > i have released the 2.6.19-rc6-rt8 tree, which can be downloaded from > > I saw usb transport errors here before rebooting with > nmi_watchdog=0 > contained in kernel command line.
so nmi_watchdog=1 (or was it nmi_watchdog=2 ?) caused these problems - and then nmi_watchdog=0 fixed them? i686? Extremely weird. Does the patch below fix the issue perhaps?
Ingo
Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c =================================================================== --- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c @@ -932,12 +932,14 @@ notrace __kprobes int nmi_watchdog_tick( __profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING, regs); +#if 0 /* check for other users first */ if (notify_die(DIE_NMI, "nmi", regs, reason, 2, SIGINT) == NOTIFY_STOP) { rc = 1; touched = 1; } +#endif /* * Take the local apic timer and PIT/HPET into account. We don't Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/nmi.c =================================================================== --- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/nmi.c +++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/nmi.c @@ -814,12 +814,14 @@ int __kprobes nmi_watchdog_tick(struct p __profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING, regs); +#if 0 /* check for other users first */ if (notify_die(DIE_NMI, "nmi", regs, reason, 2, SIGINT) == NOTIFY_STOP) { rc = 1; touched = 1; } +#endif sum = read_pda(apic_timer_irqs); if (nmi_show_regs[cpu]) { - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |