![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Dmitry Mishin wrote: > On Thursday 23 November 2006 05:39, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >> Quoting Dmitry Mishin (dim@openvz.org): >>> On Wednesday 22 November 2006 19:41, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >>>> Quoting Cedric Le Goater (clg@fr.ibm.com): >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Dmitry Mishin wrote: >>>>>> This patch looks acceptable for us. >>>>> good. shall we merge it then ? see comment below. >>>>> >>>>>> BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do >>>>>> not see a reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work >>>>>> and move existent patchset over his interface. >>>>> yeah it's a bit different from andrey's but not that much and it's >>>>> more in >>>> Where is Andrey's patch? >>> This thread - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/42666 >> Thanks, Dmitry. Now I do recall seeing that before. >> >> That patchset appears to go part, but not all the way to fitting in with >> the existing namespaces. For instance, you use exit_task_namespaces() for >> refcounting, but don't put the net_namespace in the nsproxy and use your >> own mechanism for unsharing. >> >> It really seems useful to have all the namespaces be consistent whenever >> practical, and I don't think your patchset would need much tweaking to >> fit onto Cedric's patch. Am I missing a complicating factor? > No. I've already said, Cedric's patch is acceptable for us. Do you mind if we port your patchset on top of this patch ? If you have no time for that I can do it. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-29 18:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||