![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:56:57 +1100 > David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > > > > Longer term this is really messy, we should handle this some > > other way. > > Definitely. I'm not sure whether 48 is enough even for recursive > tunnels. This should really just be a hint. It's OK to spend a > bit of time reallocating skb's if it's too small, but it's not OK > to die. The recursive tunnel case is handled by the PMTU reductions in the route, isn't it? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-29 05:07 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||