![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, Nov 24 2006, Jesper Juhl wrote: > On 24/11/06, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote: > >On Fri, Nov 24 2006, Jesper Juhl wrote: > >> > Does the box survive io intensive workloads? > >> > >> It seems to. It does get sluggish as hell when there is lots of disk I/O > >but > >> it seems to be able to survive. > >> I'll try some more, with some IO benchmarks + various other stuff to see > >> if I can get it to die that way. > > > >Just wondering if you have a marginal powersupply, perhaps. > > > It is a possibility, but I doubt it, since if I use a 2.6.17.x kernel > then things are rock solid and I can't cause a lockup even if I leave > my box building kernels in the background for days. Since it triggers fairly quickly, any chance that you could try and narrow it down to a specific version that breaks? -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-24 09:49 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||