![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 24/11/06, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24 2006, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > Does the box survive io intensive workloads? > > > > It seems to. It does get sluggish as hell when there is lots of disk I/O but > > it seems to be able to survive. > > I'll try some more, with some IO benchmarks + various other stuff to see > > if I can get it to die that way. > > Just wondering if you have a marginal powersupply, perhaps. > It is a possibility, but I doubt it, since if I use a 2.6.17.x kernel then things are rock solid and I can't cause a lockup even if I leave my box building kernels in the background for days. > > > Have you tried using net or > > > serial console to see if it spits out any info before it crashes? > > > > Lacking a second box at the moment, so that's not an option currently :( > > It's likely a requirement to get any further with this issue, I'm > afraid. Nobody can debug this thing blind folded. > I'll see if I can get my hands on a second box. -- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-24 09:43 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||