![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:53:08AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >It does appear to work w/out the patch. I've asked for a small bit > >of diagnostics (below), perhaps you've got something you'd rather see? > >I expect this to be a 24C0 LPC Bridge. > > Yes, that's what I'd have asked for. If it works, I expect the device > code to be different, or both manufacturer and device code to be > invalid. Depending on the outcome, perhaps we'll need an override > option so that this test can be partially (i.e. just the device code > part) or entirely (all the FWH detection) skipped. > The base problem is the vague documentation of the whole > detection mechanism - a lot of this I had to read between the lines. The bug report I referenced came back with this from that debug patch.. intel_rng: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted. intel_rng: pci vendor:device 8086:24c0 fwh_dec_en1 80 bios_cntl_val 2 mfc cb dvc 88 intel_rng: FWH not detected Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-24 21:35 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||