![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thursday 23 November 2006 05:39, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Dmitry Mishin (dim@openvz.org):> > On Wednesday 22 November 2006 19:41, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > Quoting Cedric Le Goater (clg@fr.ibm.com):> > > > Hello,> > > >> > > > Dmitry Mishin wrote:> > > > > This patch looks acceptable for us.> > > >> > > > good. shall we merge it then ? see comment below.> > > >> > > > > BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do > > > > > not see a reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work > > > > > and move existent patchset over his interface.> > > >> > > > yeah it's a bit different from andrey's but not that much and it's > > > > more in> > >> > > Where is Andrey's patch?> >> > This thread - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/42666>> Thanks, Dmitry. Now I do recall seeing that before. >> That patchset appears to go part, but not all the way to fitting in with > the existing namespaces. For instance, you use exit_task_namespaces() for > refcounting, but don't put the net_namespace in the nsproxy and use your > own mechanism for unsharing.>> It really seems useful to have all the namespaces be consistent whenever > practical, and I don't think your patchset would need much tweaking to > fit onto Cedric's patch. Am I missing a complicating factor? No. I've already said, Cedric's patch is acceptable for us. -- Thanks, Dmitry. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-23 10:13 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||