[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/5] libfs : file/directory removal fix, 2.6.18
    On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 08:50:56AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
    > On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 03:22:44AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
    > > Fix file and directory removal in libfs. Add inotify support for file removal.
    > >
    > > The following scenario :
    > > create dir a
    > > create dir a/b
    > >
    > > cd a/b (some process goes in cwd a/b)
    > >
    > > rmdir a/b
    > > rmdir a
    > >
    > > fails due to the fact that "a" appears to be non empty.
    > What? Caller will do d_delete() itself. Care to show a version where
    > that would happen and post an strace of the second rmdir?
    > > It is because the "b"
    > > dentry is not deleted from "a" and still in use. The same problem happens if
    > > "b" is a file. d_delete is nice enough to know when it needs to unhash and free
    > > the dentry if nothing else is using it or, if someone is using it, to remove it
    > > from the hash queues and wait for it to be deleted when it has no users.
    > >
    > > The nice side-effect of this fix is that it calls the file removal
    > > notification.
    > NAK. First of all, I won't believe you without actual strace.
    > What's more, WTF would fs _method_ call idiotify? Keep that crap
    > out of filesystems; caller will do it for us just fine.

    PS: debugfs, sysfs et sodding alia should take care to do things equivalent
    to vfs_unlink(), etc. _That_ is definitive user of fs methods, which, in
    turn, sets the rules for library helpers used by such.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-11-23 10:05    [W:0.020 / U:98.204 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site