![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm@osdl.org): > On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:12:03 +0100 > Chris Friedhoff <chris@friedhoff.org> wrote: > > > xinit respects capabilities (at least i guess), so when the system has > > capability-support, the binary /usr/X11R6/bin/xinit neeeds the > > capability cap_kill even when no capability extended attribute exists > > for this binary. > > > > setfcaps cap_kill=ep /usr/X11R6/bin/xinit > > > > I documented this here: > > http://www.friedhoff.org/fscaps.html#Xorg,%20xinit,%20xfce,%20kde > > > > and for more: > > http://www.friedhoff.org/fscaps.html > > > > Even when CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES=n? No, the patch shouldn't change behavior when CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES=n, though of course I see why it did. I will send a fixed patch tomorrow or this weekend. sorry, -serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-23 21:45 [W:0.370 / U:0.140 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||