![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 03:09:34PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov (johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru) wrote: > Ok, to solve the problem in the way which should be good for both I > decided to implement additional syscall which will allow to mark any > event as ready and thus wake up appropriate threads. If userspace will > request zero events to be marked as ready, syscall will just > interrupt/wakeup one of the listeners parked in syscall. Btw, what about putting aditional multiplexer into add/remove/modify switch? There will be logical 'ready' addon? -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-22 12:19 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||