lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 22 Nov 2006 12:00:59 +0100
From"Jesper Juhl" <>
SubjectRe: Simple script that locks up my box with recent kernels
On 22/11/06, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >
> > So it *seems* to be somehow related to running low on RAM and swap
> > starting to be used.
>
> Does it happen if you just do some simple "use all memory" script, eg run
> a few copies of
>
>         #define SIZE (100<<20)
>
>         char *buf = malloc(SIZE);
>         memset(buf, SIZE, 0);
>         sleep(100);
>
> on your box?
>

I'll try, when I get home from work. I'll let you know later.


> > The box has 2GB of RAM and 768MB swap.
>
> I wonder.. It _used_ to be true that we were pretty good at making swap be
> "extra" memory. But maybe we've lost some of that, and we have trouble
> with having more physical memory. We could end up in a situation where we
> allocate it all very quickly (because we don't actually page it out, we
> just allocate backing store for the pages), and we screw something up.
>
> But stupid bugs there should still leave us trivially able to do the SysRQ
> things, so..
>
Well, it's a fact that sysrq works just fine before the lockup but
does not work at all after a lockup, so...


> Is it highmem-related? Some bounce-buffering problem while having to swap?

I can try building a kernel without highmem support and see if I can
still cause it to lockup. Would be an interresting datapoint.

I'll also try reproducing the lockup without any swap active to see if
that makes a difference.


> What block device driver do you use for the swap device?
>
It's a swap partition on a IBM Ultra160 10K RPM SCSI disk. The
controller is an Adaptec 29160N. Using the SCSI_AIC7XXX driver.


> I don't think we use any irq-disable locking in the VM itself, but I could
> imagine some nasty situation with the block device layer getting into a
> deadlock with interrupts disabled when it runs out of queue entries and
> cannot allocate more memory..
>
Just let me know what you would like me to try/test to prove/disprove that.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-22 11:05    [W:0.147 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans