![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Quoting Dmitry Mishin (dim@openvz.org): > On Wednesday 22 November 2006 19:41, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Cedric Le Goater (clg@fr.ibm.com): > > > Hello, > > > > > > Dmitry Mishin wrote: > > > > > > > This patch looks acceptable for us. > > > > > > good. shall we merge it then ? see comment below. > > > > > > > BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do not see a > > > > reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work and move existent > > > > patchset over his interface. > > > > > > yeah it's a bit different from andrey's but not that much and it's more in > > > > Where is Andrey's patch? > This thread - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/42666 Thanks, Dmitry. Now I do recall seeing that before. That patchset appears to go part, but not all the way to fitting in with the existing namespaces. For instance, you use exit_task_namespaces() for refcounting, but don't put the net_namespace in the nsproxy and use your own mechanism for unsharing. It really seems useful to have all the namespaces be consistent whenever practical, and I don't think your patchset would need much tweaking to fit onto Cedric's patch. Am I missing a complicating factor? thanks, -serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-23 02:43 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||