![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Quoting Cedric Le Goater (clg@fr.ibm.com): > Hello, > > Dmitry Mishin wrote: > > > This patch looks acceptable for us. > > good. shall we merge it then ? see comment below. > > > BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do not see a > > reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work and move existent > > patchset over his interface. > > yeah it's a bit different from andrey's but not that much and it's more in Where is Andrey's patch? > the spirit of uts and ipc namespace (and user namespace if that reaches the > kernel one day :) so that's why i made the small changes. I agree the namespace frameworks should be consistent, but i don't know whether Andrey's is or not. I'd like to have the framework included so we reduce the number of silly rewrites due to clone flag collisions etc. > > It also helping the nsproxy/namespace syscalls to have a similar interface > to manipulate namespaces. who knows, soon we might be able to have a 'struct > namespace' with a ops field to define new namespace types ? > > I can also send a empty framework for user namespace ;) Please do - then I'll rebase the patchset I sent to the containes list onto your patch, and resubmit the whole userns. -serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-22 16:45 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||