lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: 2.6.19-rc5: lockdep warnings starting irattach
From
Date
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 16:12 +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:

> =============================================
> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> 2.6.19-rc5-2avb #2
> - ---------------------------------------------
> pppd/26425 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&hashbin->hb_spinlock){....}, at: [<dfdea87a>] irlmp_slsap_inuse+0x5a/0x170
> [irda]
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&hashbin->hb_spinlock){....}, at: [<dfdea857>] irlmp_slsap_inuse+0x37/0x170
> [irda]
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 1 lock held by pppd/26425:
> #0: (&hashbin->hb_spinlock){....}, at: [<dfdea857>]
> irlmp_slsap_inuse+0x37/0x170 [irda]
>
> stack backtrace:
> [<c010413c>] dump_trace+0x1cc/0x200
> [<c010418a>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
> [<c01047f2>] show_trace+0x12/0x20
> [<c01048c9>] dump_stack+0x19/0x20
> [<c01346ca>] __lock_acquire+0x8fa/0xc20
> [<c0134d2d>] lock_acquire+0x5d/0x80
> [<c02a851c>] _spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
> [<dfdea87a>] irlmp_slsap_inuse+0x5a/0x170 [irda]
> [<dfdebab2>] irlmp_open_lsap+0x62/0x180 [irda]
> [<dfdf35d1>] irttp_open_tsap+0x181/0x230 [irda]
> [<dfdc0c3d>] ircomm_open_tsap+0x5d/0xa0 [ircomm]
> [<dfdc05d8>] ircomm_open+0xb8/0xd0 [ircomm]
> [<dfdd0477>] ircomm_tty_open+0x4f7/0x570 [ircomm_tty]
> [<c020bbe4>] tty_open+0x174/0x340
> [<c016bd69>] chrdev_open+0x89/0x170
> [<c0167bd6>] __dentry_open+0xa6/0x1d0
> [<c0167da5>] nameidata_to_filp+0x35/0x40
> [<c0167df9>] do_filp_open+0x49/0x50
> [<c0167e47>] do_sys_open+0x47/0xd0
> [<c0167f0c>] sys_open+0x1c/0x20
> [<c010307d>] sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x8d
> [<b7f86410>] 0xb7f86410
> =======================

The comment at the nesting lock says:

/* Careful for priority inversions here !
* irlmp->links is never taken while another IrDA
* spinlock is held, so we are safe. Jean II */
So, under the assumption the author was right, it just needs a lockdep
annotation.

(depends on patches in -mm for spin_lock_irqsave_nested())

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
net/irda/irlmp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6-mm/net/irda/irlmp.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-mm.orig/net/irda/irlmp.c 2006-11-20 09:54:50.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6-mm/net/irda/irlmp.c 2006-11-20 09:57:39.000000000 +0100
@@ -1678,7 +1678,7 @@ static int irlmp_slsap_inuse(__u8 slsap_
* every IrLAP connection and check every LSAP associated with each
* the connection.
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&irlmp->links->hb_spinlock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave_nested(&irlmp->links->hb_spinlock, flags, 1);
lap = (struct lap_cb *) hashbin_get_first(irlmp->links);
while (lap != NULL) {
IRDA_ASSERT(lap->magic == LMP_LAP_MAGIC, goto errlap;);

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-20 10:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site