[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] cpufreq: mark cpufreq_tsc() as core_initcall_sync
    On Mon, Nov 20 2006, Alan Stern wrote:
    > Paul:
    > Here's my version of your patch from yesterday. It's basically the same,
    > but I cleaned up the code in a few places and fixed a bug (the sign of idx
    > in srcu_read_unlock). Also I changed the init routine back to void, since
    > it's no longer an error if the per-cpu allocation fails.
    > More importantly, I added a static initializer and included the fast-path
    > in synchronize_srcu. It's protected by the new symbol
    > SMP__STORE_MB_LOAD_WORKS, which should be defined in arch-specific headers
    > for those architectures where the store-mb-load pattern is safe.

    Must we introduce memory allocations in srcu_read_lock()? It makes it
    much harder and nastier for me to use. I'd much prefer a failing
    init_srcu(), seems like a much better API.

    Jens Axboe

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-11-20 19:01    [W:0.020 / U:13.604 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site