lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 3 Nov 2006 03:11:45 +0100
FromAdrian Bunk <>
SubjectRe: 2.6.19-rc1: x86_64 slowdown in lmbench's fork
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 10:34:13AM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 11:33 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> > My only partial guess is that it might be worth adding the per cpu
> > variables my patch adds without any of the corresponding code changes.
> > And see if adding variables to the per cpu area is what is causing the
> > change.
> > 
> > The two tests I can see in this line are:
> > - to add the percpu vector_irq variable.
> > - to increase NR_IRQs.
> 
> Increasing the NR_IRQs resulted in the regression.
>...

What's your CONFIG_NR_CPUS setting that you are seeing such a big
regression?

> Tim

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-03 03:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2008