![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thursday, 2 November 2006 22:26, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:02:01PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi, > > Ji Rafael, > > > On Tuesday, 31 October 2006 20:56, you wrote: > > > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc4 compared to 2.6.18 > > > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. > > > > Can we please add the following two to the list of known regressions: > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7082 > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7207 > > > > They are regressions with respect to 2.6.17.x kernels, but still. > >... > > I'm sorry, but I'm only tracking regressions since 2.6.18 - "regressions > since the latest stable kernel" is a clear border, and the number of > post-2.6.18 regressions is high enough that adding even more > regressions to my list wouldn't make sense. Fair enough. Greetings, Rafael -- You never change things by fighting the existing reality. R. Buckminster Fuller - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-02 21:45 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||