![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 11:33 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > My only partial guess is that it might be worth adding the per cpu > variables my patch adds without any of the corresponding code changes. > And see if adding variables to the per cpu area is what is causing the > change.> > The two tests I can see in this line are:> - to add the percpu vector_irq variable.> - to increase NR_IRQs. Increasing the NR_IRQs resulted in the regression. Adding the percpu vector_irq variable did not cause any changes. Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-02 20:27 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||