![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:26:12PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: >>>>> Even with CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED enabled? For some reason I'm guessing >>>>> that you missed that suggestion a while back... >>>> Yes - Enabling CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED didn't help. >>> Ok, you are correct, for a stupid reason, this option didn't correctly >>> work for a range of device types (I can get into the gory details if >>> anyone really cares...) >>> >>> I've now fixed this up, and a few other bugs that I kept tripping on >>> (which others also hit), and have refreshed my tree so that the next -mm >>> will be much better in this area. >>> >>> If the problem persists (and I've built a zillion different kernels in >>> different configurations today testing to make sure it doesn't), please >>> let me know. >>> >>> I can post updated patches here if people want them. >>> >>> thanks for everyone's patience, I appreciated it. >> Thanks for fixing this up. If you could post a diff somewhere against >> either mainline or -mm, would make it easy to run through >> test.kernel.org before you wake up tommorow ;-) > > Oops, the newest -mm just came out without any of the driver core > patches in it due to the problems. I'll wait until the next -mm release > then, and try to go catch up on my pending-patch-queue right now > instead... If we can test it out of sync, it'd save potentially messing up another -mm cycle. The problem is that it blocks lots of other patches from getting tested ... M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-02 06:37 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||