[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [discuss] Re: 2.6.19-rc5: known regressions (v3)
    Andrew Morton writes:
    > On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:55:46 +0100
    > Mikael Pettersson <> wrote:
    > > Andrew Morton writes:
    > > > Surely the appropriate behaviour is to allow oprofile to steal the NMI and
    > > > to then put the NMI back to doing the watchdog thing after oprofile has
    > > > finished with it.
    > >
    > > Which is _exactly_ what pre-2.6.19-rc1 kernels did. I implemented
    > > the in-kernel API allowing real performance counter drivers like
    > > oprofile (and perfctr) to claim the HW from the NMI watchdog,
    > > do their work, and then release it which resumed the watchdog.
    > OK. But from Andi's comments it seems that the NMI watchdog was failing to
    > resume its operation.

    It certainly worked when I originally implemented it. If it didn't work
    that way before 2.6.19-rc1 butchered it then that would have been a bug
    that should have been fixed.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-11-17 11:11    [W:0.019 / U:30.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site