lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 18 Nov 2006 03:02:00 +0100
FromFolkert van Heusden <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] emit logging when a process receives a fatal signal
Hi,

> > I found that sometimes processes disappear on some heavily used system
> > of mine without any logging. So I've written a patch against 2.6.18.2
> > which emits logging when a process emits a fatal signal.
> Why not to patch default signal handlers in glibc, to have not only
> stderr, but syslog, or /dev/kmsg copy of fatal messages?

Afaik when a proces gets shot because of a segfault, also the libraries
it used are shot so to say. iirc some of the more fatal signals are
handled directly by the kernel.


Folkert van Heusden

-- 
www.biglumber.com <- site where one can exchange PGP key signatures 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-18 02:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2008