lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Boot failure with ext2 and initrds
    Hugh Dickins wrote:
    > On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
    >> The below might help.
    >
    > Indeed it does (with Martin's E2FSBLK warning fix),
    > seems to be running well on all machines now.
    >
    > (Of course, my ext2_fsblk_t ext2_new_blocks() notion did not pan out,
    > for same reason as the original: that ret_block was expected signed.)

    Whilst I've got all the smart people looking at this ...

    /*max window size: 1024(direct blocks) + 3([t,d]indirect blocks) */
    #define EXT2_MAX_RESERVE_BLOCKS 1027

    Is that wrong? If it's meaning one triple, one double, and one single
    indirect block, surely it can span a boundary, so we need (potentially)
    two of each?

    M.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-11-14 22:23    [W:2.375 / U:0.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site