![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:53:11AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Either that or lkml is/remains for bug reporting and we move development
> somewhere else. Or my [repeated] preference:
>
> do development on specific mailing lists (although there would
> likely need to be a fallback list when it's not clear which mailing
> list should be used)
I've been thinking about this too for a while now. There is something
like half of the email volume which are (semi-)automated emails
containing patches moving from a GIT tree to another. I think that
moving this to some linux-dev or something like this would :
1) reduce the noise on LKML so that problem reports are better caught
2) reduce the global email volume because instead of sending all these
emails to 10-20000 persons(?), only maybe a thousand will be subscribed.
3) reduce even more the latency between post and publication due to 2.
I don't know if others would be interested, in which case it would be wise
to poll on the subject and include Matti and Davem to the discussion.
Regards,
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-11 07:19 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||