lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 10 Nov 2006 09:57:28 +0100
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [patch 13/19] GTOD: Mark TSC unusable for highres timers
* Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

> If so, could that function use the PIT/pmtimer/etc for working out if 
> the TSC is bust, rather than directly using jiffies?

there's no realiable way to figure out the TSC is bust: some CPUs have a 
slight 'skew' between cores for example. On some systems the TSC might 
skew between sockets. A CPU might break its TSC only once some 
powersaving mode has been activated - which might be long after bootup. 
The whole TSC business is a nightmare and cannot be supported reliably. 
AFAIK Windows doesnt use it, so it's a continuous minefield for new 
hardware to break.

We should wait until CPU makers get their act together and implement a 
TSC variant that is /architecturally promised/ to have constant 
frequency (system bus frequency or whatever) and which never stops.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-10 09:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2008