lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRE: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:

> So designate only one CPU within a domain to do load balance between groups
> for that specific sched domain should in theory fix the 2nd problem you
> identified. Did you get a chance to look at the patch Suresh posted?

Yes, I am still thinking about how this would work. This would mean that
the first cpu on a system would move busy processes to itself from all
1023 other processes? That does not sound appealing.

Processes in the allnodes domain would move to processor #0. The next
lower layer are the nodes groups. Not all of the groups at that layer
contain processor #0. So we would never move processes into those sched
domains?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-11 03:55    [W:0.054 / U:0.604 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site