[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/13] BC: atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave() helper
    Hello Kirill, Hello Pavel,

    Kirill Korotaev wrote:
    > Oleg Nesterov noticed to me that the construction like
    > (used in beancounter patches and free_uid()):
    > local_irq_save(flags);
    > if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&refcnt, &lock))
    > ...
    > is not that good for preemtible kernels, since with preemption
    > spin_lock() can schedule() to reduce latency. However, it won't schedule
    > if interrupts are disabled.
    > So this patch introduces atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave() as a logical
    > counterpart to atomic_dec_and_lock().

    You should probably send that one independently from the BC

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-11-10 16:23    [W:0.020 / U:7.688 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site