Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Nov 2006 23:21:12 +0530 | From | Srivatsa Vaddagiri <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices |
| |
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:04:01AM -0800, Matt Helsley wrote: > > >> 3. Configfs may be easily implemented later as an additional > > >> interface. I propose the following solution: > > > > > > Ideally we should have one interface - either syscall or configfs - and > > > not both. > > To incorporate all feedback perhaps we should replace "configfs" with > "filesystem".
Yes, you are right.
-- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |