lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 1 Nov 2006 23:21:12 +0530
FromSrivatsa Vaddagiri <>
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:04:01AM -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > >> 3. Configfs may be easily implemented later as an additional
> > >>    interface. I propose the following solution:
> > > 
> > > Ideally we should have one interface - either syscall or configfs - and
> > > not both.
> 
> To incorporate all feedback perhaps we should replace "configfs" with
> "filesystem".

Yes, you are right.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-01 18:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2008