lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
    On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:04:01AM -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
    > > >> 3. Configfs may be easily implemented later as an additional
    > > >> interface. I propose the following solution:
    > > >
    > > > Ideally we should have one interface - either syscall or configfs - and
    > > > not both.
    >
    > To incorporate all feedback perhaps we should replace "configfs" with
    > "filesystem".

    Yes, you are right.

    --
    Regards,
    vatsa
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-11-01 18:51    [W:4.557 / U:0.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site