Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 1 Nov 2006 01:50:30 -0800 | | From | Paul Jackson <> | | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices |
| |
David wrote: > - While the process containers are only single-level, the controllers are > _inherently_ hierarchial just like a filesystem. So it appears that
Cpusets certainly enjoys what I would call hierarchical process containers. I can't tell if your flat container space is just a "for instance", or you're recommending we only have a flat container space.
If the later, I disagree.
> So it appears > that the manipulation of containers would most effectively be done from > userspace by a syscall approach.
Yup - sure sounds like you're advocating a flat container space accessed by system calls.
Sure doesn't sound right to me. I like hierarchical containers, accessed via like a file system.
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |