lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
David wrote:
> - While the process containers are only single-level, the controllers are
> _inherently_ hierarchial just like a filesystem. So it appears that

Cpusets certainly enjoys what I would call hierarchical process
containers. I can't tell if your flat container space is just
a "for instance", or you're recommending we only have a flat
container space.

If the later, I disagree.

> So it appears
> that the manipulation of containers would most effectively be done from
> userspace by a syscall approach.

Yup - sure sounds like you're advocating a flat container space
accessed by system calls.

Sure doesn't sound right to me. I like hierarchical containers,
accessed via like a file system.

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-01 10:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans