![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Am Sonntag, 8. Oktober 2006 02:03 schrieben Sie: > On Saturday 07 October 2006 10:16 am, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > > > I dare say that the commonest scenario involving USB is a laptop with > > > > an input device attached. Input devices are for practical purposes always > > > > opened. A simple resume upon open and suspend upon close is useless. > > That is, the standard model is useless? I think you've made > a few strange leaps of logic there ... care to fill in those > gaps and explain just _why_ that standard model is "useless"??? If a device is always opened, as mice are, it will not be suspended. Yet they can be without any data to deliver forever. Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-10-08 06:43 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||