![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 22:52:11 -0400 Matt LaPlante wrote: > Hi Randy, > Thanks for the feedback as always. See below... > > > > -iii.Ability to represent large i/os w/o unecessarily breaking them up (i.e > > > +iii.Ability to represent large i/os w/o unnecessarily breaking them up (i.e > > > > I'd prefer to see "I/Os" "without" "i.e.". > > This style is throughout this text. It can be changed, but would be easier to do in > its own diff rather than changing the whole file here. Left as-is. Yes, agreed. > > > - triggers an interrupt on the SPU. The value writting to the signal > > > + triggers an interrupt on the SPU. The value writing to the signal > > > > I think that should be "written". > > > > > -may result unpredictabe behavior. > > > +may result unpredictable behavior. > > > > may result in unpredictable behavior. > > > > Fixed and Fixed. Updated version below. Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-10-07 04:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||