lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Status on CPU hotplug issues
    On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 04:29:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > Can you describe the nature of the cpu-hotplug tests you're running? I'd
    > be fairly staggered if the kernel was able to survive a full-on cpu-hotplug
    > stress test for more than one second, frankly. There's a lot of code in
    > there which is non-hotplug-aware. Running a non-preemptible kernel would
    > make things appear more stable, perhaps.

    Certainly, the testsuite is one the OSDL Hotplug SIG put together last
    summer, and consists of several test cases:

    http://developer.osdl.org/dev/HOTPLUG/planning/hotplug_cpu_test_plan_status.html

    hotplug01: Check IRQ behavior during cpu hotplug events
    hotplug02: Check process migration during cpu hotplug events
    hotplug03: Verify tasks get scheduled on newly onlined cpu's
    hotplug04: Verify disallowing offlining all CPU's
    hotplug05: (Unimplemented)
    hotplug06: Check userspace tools (sar, top) during cpu hotplug events
    hotplug07: Stress case doing kernel compile while cpu's are
    hotplugged on and off repeatedly

    It can be downloaded here:
    http://developer.osdl.org/dev/hotplug/tests/

    Results are posted here:
    http://crucible.osdl.org/runs/hotplug_report.html

    We've been running this testsuite fairly continuously for several
    months, and irregularly for about a year before that. We find that on
    some platforms like PPC64 it's quite robust, and on others there are
    issues, but the developers tend to be quick to provide fixes as the
    issues are found. I'm glad to see that the results are finally showing
    green for ia64.

    > > Issues were found in four areas: General kernel, cpu hotplug, sysstat,
    > > and the test harness itself.
    >
    > It's surprising that AMD and Intel CPUs behave differently. Also a good
    > start on diagnosing things.

    I was also surprised to see this too. Note that the .config's for the
    amd and em64t machines are considerably different (different drivers,
    etc.), but the cpu config should be relatively comparable. Still, I
    wouldn't rule out the different behaviors being due to configuration
    differences. We could work on homogenizing the configs of the two
    systems if that would help in troubleshooting?

    Thanks,
    Bryce

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-10-07 02:03    [W:0.025 / U:0.108 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site