Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:26:29 +0200 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: sunifdef instead of unifdef |
| |
> However, there are three main reasons why I pledge for sunifdef > compatibility: > > 1. There is a project page and an inviting community > 2. There is HTML documentation > 3. They use autotools, which is distributor and administrator-friendly
You do realize that unifdef is included in the kernel so it just works?
> gcc -O2 -m64 -c -o unifdef.o unifdef.c > unifdef.c: In function 'main': > unifdef.c:129: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in > function 'exit' > unifdef.c:157: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in > function 'exit' > unifdef.c:180: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in > function 'exit' > gcc unifdef.o -o unifdef Patches appreciated - seems a simple #include is missing.
Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |