[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 1/1] schedule removal of FUTEX_FD
    On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 15:09 -0800, wrote:
    > From: Andrew Morton <>
    > Apparently FUTEX_FD is unfixably racy and nothing uses it (or if it does, it
    > shouldn't).
    > Add a warning printk, give any remaining users six months to migrate off it.

    This makes sense. FUTEX_FD was for the NGPT project which did userspace
    threading, and hence couldn't block. It was always kind of a hack
    (although unfixably racy isn't quite right, it depends on usage).

    However, the existence of FUTEX_FD is what made Ingo complain that we
    couldn't simply pin the futex page in memory, because now a process
    could pin one page per fd. Removing it would seem to indicate that we
    can return to a much simpler scheme of (1) pinning a page when someone
    does futex_wait, and (2) simply comparing futexes by physical address.

    Now, I realize with some dismay that simplicity is no longer a futex
    feature, but it might be worth considering?

    PS. I used to have a patch for "ratelim_printk()" which hashed on the
    format string to reduce the chance that one message limit would clobber
    other messages. I'll dig it out...

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-11-01 02:21    [W:0.022 / U:5.064 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site