Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:54:34 -0800 | From | "Paul Menage" <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller |
| |
On 10/31/06, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org> wrote: > > Paul Menage won't agree. He believes that interface must come first.
No, I'm just trying to get agreement on the generic infrastructure for process containers and extensibility - the actual API to the memory controller (i.e. what limits, what to track, etc) can presumably be fitted into the generic mechanism fairly easily (or else the infrastructure probably isn't generic enough).
Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |