![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:34:52AM -0800, Paul Menage wrote: > How about the cpusets approach, where once a cpuset has no children > and no processes, a usermode helper can be executed - this could > immediately remove the container/bean-counter if that's what the user > wants. My generic containers patch copies this from cpusets. Bingo. We crossed mails! Kirill/Pavel, As I mentioned in the begining of this thread, one of the objective of this RFC is to seek consensus on what could be a good compromise for the infrastructure in going forward. Paul Menage's patches, being rework of existing code, is attactive to maintainers like Andew. From that perspective, how well do you think the container infrastructure patches meet your needs? -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-10-31 16:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||