Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:30:21 +0100 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched.c : correct comment for this_rq_lock() routine |
| |
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:34:08PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, David Rientjes wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > > > > Correct the comment for the this_rq_lock() routine. > > > > > > > You submitted this same patch two days ago. > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/28/54 > > that's right, i did. and given that it was a trivial, aesthetic patch > but a couple "git pull" cycles went by without it being applied, i > figured i might as well submit it again. > > quite honestly, at this point, given that it's this much trouble to > fix a freaking comment in a single file, i'm seriously losing interest > in wasting any more of my time at this. life is just too short to > volunteer unpaid labour that just gets dropped on the floor because > you don't know the secret handshake.
In case you're still doubtful about volunteering:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/20/255
-- Regards/Gruß, Boris. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |