lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: AMD X2 unsynced TSC fix?
From
Date
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 18:41 -0800, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:03:28AM +0000, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > time.c: Lost 300 timer tick(s)! rip mwait_idle+0x33/0x4f)
> > time.c: Lost 300 timer tick(s)! rip mwait_idle+0x33/0x4f)
> > time.c: Lost 300 timer tick(s)! rip mwait_idle+0x33/0x4f)
> > time.c: Lost 300 timer tick(s)! rip mwait_idle+0x33/0x4f)
>
> Is this the reason why you are saying your system has unsynchronized TSC?

yes

> Some where in this thread, you mentioned that Lost ticks happen even
> when you use "notsc"

yes, with news kernels 2.6.19-rcx

>
> This sounds to me as a different problem. Can you send us the output
> of /proc/interrupts?

of which kernel ?
I am not at home ..
but I have here /proc/interrupts from one 2.6.16
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7927&action=view
from my bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6419

Tonight I can attach on bugzilla bug#6419, /proc/interrupts from one
kernel 2.6.18 and from one kernel 2.6.19-rc4

BTW: those kernels are for x86_64 arch, I haven't try, yet, i386, but
maybe will be my next test.

Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
>
> thanks,
> suresh

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-31 16:07    [W:0.140 / U:1.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site